lizdamnit: vaporpeaks (Default)

Our digital lives are actively abusive and hostile, riddled with subtle and overt cons. Our apps are ever-changing, adapting not to our needs or conditions, but to the demands of investors and internal stakeholders that have reduced who we are and what we do to an ever-growing selection of manipulatable metrics. 

It isn’t that you don’t “get” tech, it’s that the tech you use every day is no longer built for you, and as a result feels a very specific kind of insane.

"Never Forgive Them" Ed Zitron
lizdamnit: vaporpeaks (Default)
I'm not a tech person, I am not trained or educated in any of this. But I feel compelled to do something, and to encourage anyone listening to also do something. As a response to what I was talking about in the previous post, I've changed how I live online. I've had to re-imagine my digital life and how I use these tools to safeguard my sanity and whatever passes for privacy.

This can be understood as the difference between diet culture and changing your relationship with food – the former is wildly popular but will hurt you in the long run but the former requires a lot of thought, conscious effort, and the grace to forgive yourself if you screw up. Let's run with this concept now.

Digital Diets Vs. Intuitive Posting

Colleen Christiansen is a registered dietitian who promotes intuitive eating and “no food rules” as an alternative to diet culture. Her posts came across my tiktok ages ago and I've followed her since. I like her cheerful persona and skits, but I really like her commitment to non-judgement about food choices. She does not support carte blanche eating or gorging, but instead encourages people to pay attention to their bodies' cues which I struggle with myself. So I made her part of my regular rotation and I continued to follow her on other platforms when I left TikTok.

In her blog and the rest of the content she creates, she shares principles of intuitive eating that can be helpful in maintaining health and resisting a diet-fixated, damaging culture around food and eating.

She's pretty big on “no food rules” to help people recognize and actually change unhealthy attitudes about eating. There are no “good” or “bad” foods, there is recognition that everyone is going through health and emotional concerns that are not always apparent to others, and there are no tabulation systems to keep people constantly aware of their intake and second guessing themselves. With “no food rules”, she encourages people to not just listen to their bodies and emotions, but learn basics of how nutrients function in the body so they can make informed decisions about food rather than reactions.

In thinking about how I use tech and specifically social media, I keep thinking about Christiansen's approach and I think it's a spectacular way to help us consider the place of this technology in our lives. “No food rules” makes the “user” gently conscious and encourages agency around food. Maybe we should start treating social media in the same way and making more active choices rather than constantly convenience-consuming.

Don't get me wrong, I read the news, I know what's happening at a wildly alarming rate. Part of me literally wants to burn it all down and go back to Windows 3.1 and make everyone build their own webpages if they want to participate. But that's not realistic any more than stereotypical New Years' diet resolutions are realistic.

Again, I'm neither educated nor trained in this, I am a schmuck with an internet connection, but given the recent political hellscape, I sat down and had a talk with myself about how I use social media. I'm sharing what I do here in case anyone who is in a similar position is having the same thoughts. You don't have to be a techy person to start to take control of how you use technology. One of the best places to start is taking inventory of habits and modifying them. These are things I do, they may or may not work for you, too. In no particular order:

  • I log off. Physically hit “log out” buttons as often as possible. No more 24/7 connectivity.
  • I'm on multiple places and let friends know where else to find me, so I don't become dependent on one platform.
  • Delete the apps. You can use social media through the browser. Yes, this is more inconvenient. That's the point. I don't want this to be something I open just because. The more steps I put into accessing these sites, the more I have to think about the time I spend on them.
  • Back up media. The photos, videos, posts, etc. (except for small things like Bluesky) have to live elsewhere. My life should not only be stored on a Meta product.
  • I extended this to Google Drive. I still like it and I use it for work, but I had to go cold turkey for personal stuff. It's a great service, but if Google takes a wild hair, I loose all my writing, photos, etc? No way!
  • I don't fill 0ut all info and I'm often coy with what I do fill in. I don't put my workplace on personal socials, I don't use my real name, I also try not to discuss plans in advance as much as possible. This is not out of paranoia but to make sure I don't start “reporting in” out of habit.
  • I've slowed down posting photos and I never tag people. It was great fun at one point, but it's so hard to manage your own photos and modify tags if needed it's not worth doing any more.
  • I block early and often. I don't care. If I get a new follower I don't know in meatspace, I'm checking for signs of life, a varied post history, evidence of hobbies, and interests, and an erratic normal-people post schedule. This goes double if they're talking about politics. Too many troll farms, bots, and #resist@nce grifters are too slick these days. If someone doesn't pass the smell test, block.
  • For that matter, I asterisk or mess with the spelling of certain terms like what I did with “resist@nce” in number 6. Say I do want to vent about something, I don't want bad actors who are searching on these terms to harass me or anyone I'm talking with. People definitely do this.
  • I rarely post into hashtags and I think several times before popping off on anything I am heated about, because it's all too easy for jackasses to start harassing people and I don't feel like dealing.
  • I ask myself “do I need to post this?” all the time. I think extra hard about how and where I should express myself. Does a thought or observation need to be on social media? Who's my audience on what platform? Can I substitute using something that is not a giant corporation?

What this boils down to is that I've made sustained efforts to change how I exist on social media. I've expanded my palette of where I am online, I've tried to change my habits to make doomscrolling and 24/7 connection harder to fall into. I'm trying to literally be more mindful and make choices with regards to social media instead of just bellying up to the bar. Very wealthy people have invested a lot into convincing us this is the only place social activity can happen and you know what, I decline. I don't have all the answers and I don't even necessarily have the best practices, but what I have here is a start and that's good enough for me.

lizdamnit: vaporpeaks (Default)
I'm thinking a lot lately about life online, especially with regards to concepts like enshittification, the rot economy, and recent political developments in my country. I'm not happy with any of this. I'm not happy with a politically disaffected populace. I'm not happy with the elimination of thirdspaces, event virtual ones. I'm not happy with the endless surveillance, nickel and dime-ing, political interference, and overall neglect of digital spaces. I'm not happy with the era of the tech broligarch. I'm also not happy with how dependent we are on several wildly unregulated tech companies. I'm not happy with the lack of digital literacy and basic computer skills instruction. I'm not happy with the skill gap that leaves so many of us at the mercy of this broligarchy.

Around the same time I was thinking about this, I came across the term “digital autonomy” and this paper from Mayer and Lu from CASSIS at the University of Bonn. The authors are discussing digital autonomy for entire countries, focusing on the EU, noting that “Decades of neoliberal deregulation, trade, and technology-driven globalization created far-reaching dependencies that cannot be reversed overnight” (1). I'm not thinking at that scale, just the individual level. But maybe I can borrow some of the term to express myself. I'm thinking about what I'm going to call personal digital autonomy. Systemic, cultural, and certainly legal changes are necessary for the continued health of any internet-using population. But until that can happen, something has to start somewhere.

Why is there not more focus on encouraging personal digital autonomy by sharing the rudiments of device use and maintenance as well as encouraging “non techy” people to learn bits of code and make things? Why are we not encouraged to curate and maintain our own data? Why are we physically separated from not only the inner workings of our own devices but also the ways in which we make, store, and retrieve the data we generate? Why do so many of us learn things about our computers, phones, apps, and platforms by random instead of organized, concerted effort?

These questions are are rhetorical. I know why.

It's pretty profitable to make devices and processes seem like magic. Instead of fixing an issue, people feel they have no option but to buy another. Planned obsolescence also works like gangbusters here, keeping us buying. It's also amazingly profitable to have tons and tons and tons of data attached to each user. Everything we make online as private users is not private at all: it is scanned, sold, traded, scattered to the far reaches of companies' boardrooms. It's far easier to keep us throwing more and more of our lives and time into that well.

Basic knowledge

While personal computing (what a throwback term!) really took off towards the end of the 20th century, culturally (in the US at least), “we” never closed the skill gap between the nerds and the normies. We unleashed cheap machines and cheap access on a population that was unevenly educated in tech to put it very mildly. Fast forward to today where we are still dealing with the depth charge that is the smartphone and almost ubiquitous internet access.

In my various lines of work, I see people on the daily who are entirely dependent on tech as we know it. At the same time they do not know how to operate the machines and programs they need to use for daily life. This is wrong. Something is very very wrong with this. In this day and age, I should not see 20 year olds who are unable to keyboard (throwback term #2!) and grown adults who are so ignorant of the concept of opening and closing apps they leave everything open all at once.

“We” used to educate people on basic, almost primitive tech use from typing to saving and renaming documents. This should not have stopped, but it did. And goodness knows when it's coming back. At roughly the same time, tech interests gradually grafted themselves to politics and here we are now. Everything feels out of control and many of us – myself as well – feel utterly helpless.

However, I must acknowledge that formal opportunities for learning about computers are still alive and well. We still have computer training classes, public libraries are still offering assistance, we still publish “For Dummies” books. This is out there for anyone who wants it.

So why are we still having problems that make it seem that the PC just came out last year? I don't have the time or space in this post really find out but I have many hypotheses. In any event, casual, non-tech trained users (myself included!) have got to get a handle on how we use our machines and our software, especially regarding cloud storage and social media.

lizdamnit: vaporpeaks (Default)
I've been having social media related thoughts



I've been a little fixated on building out my little Neocities page recently. It's been fun to make a pretty pink mess and test out tags and scraps of HTML I used to know better. It's fun to decorate and fuss with. It's proving a lot more satisfying than social media, even though there is no social aspect to it. It's a piece of web just for me and the few people that may see it. It doesn't have much of a theme, just stuff that I like, books I am reading or am about to read, poetry, videos I enjoy, and so forth. A mishmosh. A commonplace book. It'd be nice to follow more people on there and actually communicate. Maybe that wil come in time.


Anyway, it's my latest response to a years-long, slow-moving avoidance of social media. I have multiple accounts across the usual platforms, but I don't use them with any regularity. The rot really set in after grad school - I had enjoyed posting on FB, reading others' posts, playing with the platform the way we once did. But when I graduated, it was very hard to find a job, and I felt like an utter failure. At the time, I was too emotionally invested to see that there were so many factors that depressed me and what I thought may have been the start of an academic career. But that's not the point here. The point is I can recall sitting at the kitchen table, tearfully unfollowing people who seemed to be waltzing right into plum positions, publishing, and generally living what I wanted to. Jealousy - of course. But more self-isolation and shame. I just stopped using FB with any regularity.


As I recovered, I started to realize that I was less ashamed to be "in public" as a "failure", I was getting bored on social media. FB just didn't have the fun it once did. Twitter was starting to loose its shine. IG (I only got in after FB brought it) didn't demand much effort but soon got boring as well. Eventually Tumblr became too much bother for too little reward. Why was it boring? These sites (except maybe Tumblr) were designed to be as captivating as possible.


I had become tired of no talk. No discourse. No exchange. Just likes. Hearts, thumbs-up, etc. Approving or disapproving a piece of content made one feel like one was interacting with someone else, but it was really just with the site itself. Social media had started to indulge in the cardinal sin of being boring. And I became lonely. Surrounded by people...no, profiles....and no sense of connecting with others.


Eventually, I had downloaded Tiktok to see what the fuss was over and boy howdy I was I unprepared for the firehose. I remember when social media was something you could curate, something you could modify. These endless-scroll streams of content didn't even leave visual room for signs of life. This was channel surfing, but more interesting. Just interesting enough to keep you in, but not enough to hold you even for 30 seconds.


Now I had a new problem on my hands. Over the years, boredom gave way to novelty with TikTok-like streams becoming part of IG and YT. This became a little unnerving. I indulged, and still do. But it's so easy to just hook up to the dopamine machine and swipe away for hours. I can even fall asleep scrolling - the voices are soothing. This is worrisome.



Empty Calories



The latest iteration of social media, which is anything but social, is a problem that preoccupies me. I've been consuming it way more than I would like to
but it's also "the only place where people are". I never did solve my original problem of loneliness, but a couple hours' trip down the stream sure does quiet my brain. I get to see dozens of faces, voices, lives. I follow certain comics, enjoying micro-series. I follow gardeners, potters, dominatrices, poets, dressmakers. I don't think there's anything wrong with this per se, but it's basically empty calories - no one really talks or interacts.


I can and do follow multiple streams from the same people so I can enjoy their work without being on the dopamine machine. I've discovered artists and makers that I would have never even heard of. That has to be a good thing. But the problem remains. Empty calories. When you have empty calories, you keep eating and eating, searching for satiation, but it can't occur. I keep scrolling and scrolling for satiation, but it can't occur here.


There seems to be no real way of actually connecting with anyone, even my own friends. I do stuff I'd like to share. I have interests I'd like to share. I'd love to connect and strengthen friendship and make new. I'm here and I'm fun! I'd actually like to be participating. I'd love to be streaming or podcasting. I know how to do this and with some time I could do it well. It's true I barely have the time, but I could make it. But how do you get this to people? Social Media. As I said, all you get there is a sea of likes or upvotes and end up feeding some techbro's latest project or putting yourself in the sights of some whack-a-loon.



Chilling effects



This leads me to a related thought: the dangers of putting yourself out there. What I'm about to type here feels like a cop-out but there's something to it. The way the social internet has evolved has made it dangerous. It's so easy for people to react on a split-second, to fall deeper into ideological divides. Actually, it's not even ideological anymore, ideology has become branding. People divide on brands, tags, surface-level categories. People love the familiar and love to align themselves with others like them. I've done it. You've done it. It's natural. But when combined with untrammeled "free" speech and the ever-changing whims of advertisers and tech companies, as well as the firehose of information...it becomes actually frightening.


Say the wrong thing, like the wrong thing and people start making callout posts. Actually a callout post is quaint! At least that kind of stays in one area. Today there are far, far too many ways for people to find personal information of others. Think doxxing, harassment, swatting, and so on. People can and will take the time to hunt down you, your loved ones, your job, and damage that web of connection as well as try to ensure that whatever "sin" you have committed will be linked to your real name. This is not fringe behavior - the news has examples of certain musty billionaires allowing this to happen in their names. People can now leverage tech to not only fuck up your world now, but also fuck it up in perpetuity, since part of getting into schools, jobs, and even dating will often involve at the very least a few google searches. I'm not nearly interesting or active enough for this to happen, but the fact that it could just rattles me.


Then we have the problem of "ayy-eye", as the Tiktok kids may say. Even as I'd like to be making stuff (not content. I refuse to call it content any more than I have to) I'm not all that keen on continuiously feeding the data machine my face and voice. We have unimaginably sophisticated tech that allows face and voice spoofing. Your speech patterns, intonations, face, facial expressions, and so on are all fair game. I'm sure my data stream from My Space on up is in the innards of some ayy-eye thing out there. I just hope my selfies and pics of plants and housepets aren't going to too nefarious a use.



I don't dream of labor



Social media life is an entire ass full time unpaid job. Some of my friends are able to do this in service of their careers and they do great jobs. I love their work and I'm stoked to see them advertising, making money, and making their dream real. But my god it's a lot of work. I suppose if you have a reason (eg you published a book, invented a widget, teach a course, etc) it makes sense. Personally, I don't have an overarching vision. That's more of a me-problem, true. But I don't see the benefit of deliberate use of social media unless you have a business model. For me, personally, most of my waking life is made of business. I'm literally a middle manager. No, I did not try to be there, but it's my mundane life and it's not so bad. However, I need time and space where I am not thinking and acting like that. I can't make a product of myself, coming home from work to work at social. I've tried. Doesn't work. I support my friends that can and do, but I can't. Personally, it does feel like one needs a social-sona to be able to participate. I already split my emotions enough ways dealing with work and the background radiation of a chaotic world.


Scene and be seen
Something else that's giving me pause about social spaced on our current internet is the fact that I'm suspicious AF about large communities and scenes. I grew up involved in a particularly large and well-known SciFi group. It was basically extended family and I kind of miss that. However, after a particularly traumatic experience, I lost the connection I once had. Attempts to reconnect ended up with unsavory results rather than a sense of community: leftover drama, emotional vampirism, and sexual creepiness I think I was too dumb to see as a teenager. These stood out in fucking neon signs to me as a grown woman. It was disappointing. I had had so many fun times, learned so much, was shaped so much, but revisiting that community felt like a collapsing souffle. Maybe it was me having grown up. Maybe it was changes in the community. Maybe it was both. I let those connections fade. I do miss it, though. I think I had turned to social media to fill that void and nope...no-go.


On a related note, I've been listening to the audio version of Drawing Down the Moon, essentially a history book for 20th century Neo-pagan movements. I feel a weird mix of nostalgia and jealousy listening to Adler's words. All the cool shit has been extinct for like 20-30 years! This is a known problem in Paganism....it's decentralized, communities, events, etc. are basically labors of love, and eventually the leaders die out and communities with them. And we reinvent the wheel. Usually on my morning commute, I listen to Adler's descriptions of large events, community rituals, festivals and oh, boy. Are they still there?Did they survive? What does Pagan community mean post 9-11? What does that mean post/mid-COVID? What does that mean intra-recession? Did I miss a golden age? Where can I go be "weird"? Where do I get to howl at the moon? Is it all just witchtok now? I like being solitary but even I have limits. Also - was there ever community? Can there be? If all we have now is social media, especially social media as it is presently - can we even form community? Are we all just doomed to liking each other's posts and wishing we all had that cottage in the forest together? Can we survive forever on witchtok and Pinterest boards?


Drawing Down the Moonwas republished a few times as the author updated. She didn't end up writing much about online communities before she passed (at least not in successive editions of DDtM). In the edition I have, there's mention of websites, but not social media, really. I think the author passed in 2014 or so, so she probably didn't get much of that world into the book. Others have picked up the torch, I presume. I hope. Hearing about these now-old movements, discourses, magazines, and so on produces such an odd feeling in me. Social media just can't compare with a printed journal or even a good meaty list-serv.


I hope I haven't mapped too much of my own issues onto this, but I suspect I'm not alone. At the end, I'm still worried, and not just for myself. I don't think we can afford to become more alienated and atomized. I don't think we're going to loose Paganism any more than I think we'll loose nerd culture, handcrafts, etc. etc. but I think the more we mediate through corporatized and commercially optimized tools, we're going to loose a lot before we make any progress. That worries me. With the state of the world as it is now, we need to form actual community. We need networks of nerds. We need different kinds of spaces for different communities. We need to have actual human contact, even if it's through a computer. The tech is not the problem, the business is.
lizdamnit: vaporpeaks (Default)
post header w country goose
 

You're home sick in the 90s and your mom is cleaning.....You're a wealthy divorcee watching the weather channel in the 90s....You're 10 and it's a spring day and why doesn't the world look like this anymore?


Lately I've been enjoying these hyper specific Instagram and Youtube shorts (the first 2 in the subtitle are pretty much Retro.Avocado captions: https://www.tiktok.com/@retro.avocado).  I'm no stranger to liking old things, so this shouldn't be surprising.  I'm also at a great crossroads: 40 years old and terminally online.  I am old enough to remember both life without the everpresent net and the welcome thirdspace it turned into in my teen years.  It's why I'm on this friggin' site, after all! 

But oh man does it give me a *Mood* to feel so fulfilled seeing  memes and clips like Retro.Avocado's, or throwbacks to 80s/90s life.  I've been enamored with vaporwave for a while, and my internet habits have led me to Japanese City pop as well as into a landslide of Hall and Oates(1).

Am I sad?  Somewhat.  Am I nostalgic? Of course?  Am I mad?  Probably.  I don't think a single generation has ever had 100% serious and profound memories.  You know, the kind that are untouched by trends and memes (2). Sure, memetic culture worked different before the internet, but you cannot tell me a 20-something in medieval Europe didn't get ~The Feels~ hearing a no longer fashionable song sung at the market or that a 30 year old in the 1920s  didn't let out a little sigh seeing adverts from their teens. 

Thanks to the worldwide web, I can now dial up whatever mood (vibe) and memory strikes me and indulge.  The fact that so many of them are related to things like advertising and corporate design does give me a bit of pause.  So many are related to products.  Take the seashell soaps that "everyone" had in their bath in the 90s.  We had them, dust gathered and all.  I can recall those things clearer than my mother's face.  Why is that? (3)

On one hand, vapor-stuff and related chrono-memes make me yearn for a simpler time, but it's also a time when I was just there.  Just being, without the pocket panopticons that we know and love.  Yes, surveillance happened in those days, but it's not like we handed over our data in buckets the way we (myself included) do now.

I also like the absorption I get into these memes, vibes, and images.  I can dwell on them for a while.  I can focus.  This is no small feat for me. I genuinely don't know if I have ADD or if it's just a response to living as we do today, with our minds split between daily life and the idea of doom that seems to be creeping in from all sides.
 

____________

(1) It's great fun to play the entire track for my GenZ co-workers, as opposed to the 15-second "audio"....WHAT I WANT, YOU GOT, AND IT MIGHT BE HARD TO HANDLE....#dyinginside #latestagecapitalism

(2) no shit they had serious memories, personal and cultural.  Trauma comes to mind.  Wars, famines, etc. But humans are human and we get fascinated by the silliest things as well as the most profound.

(3) I can answer myself.....the soap doesn't have related trauma, duh.

Page generated Jan. 11th, 2026 11:58 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios